Skip to content
Business automation · Finance & back office

A month-end that closes itself

Finance teams spend their best hours moving numbers between systems that were never introduced to each other. We automate invoice matching, reconciliation, expense flows and reporting — with exception queues for the genuine judgment calls, and audit trails your accountants and auditors will actually sign off.

What we take off the finance team's desk

The recurring work that fills the month — automated, monitored, and traceable end to end.

Invoice processing & matching

Capture, three-way matching against orders and receipts, posting to the ledger — mismatches queued for review.

Reconciliation

Bank, intercompany and platform reconciliations run continuously — differences surface daily, not at month-end.

Expense & AP/AR flows

Approvals, payment runs and dunning happening on schedule, with every step logged.

Month-end & reporting

The close checklist automated task by task — management reports assembled from live data, not weekend heroics.

Payback calculated before a line of code

Finance automation is the easiest to price and the costliest to get wrong — so it starts with an audit and ships like infrastructure.

01

Audit the manual work

A week inside your finance workflows, pricing each manual task in hours and salary. The output is a ranked list with payback per automation.

02

Automate the highest payback first

Usually invoice matching or a reconciliation. Live within weeks, measured against the audit's numbers.

03

Exceptions stay human

Thresholds and unusual cases route to a review queue with full context — judgment stays with people, typing doesn't.

04

Prove it, then continue

Each automation reports the hours it returns. The roadmap continues only while the numbers keep justifying it.

What ships with every automation

The moment it posts to your ledger, it's infrastructure — and it's built like it.

Monitored automations in productionRetries, idempotency, dead-letter queues — infrastructure grade
Exception queue with full contextJudgment calls reach people with everything attached
Complete audit trailEvery automated posting traceable — who, what, when, from which trigger
Payback reportHours returned vs. the audit's projection, in writing
90-day warrantyDefects fixed free after acceptance

Common questions

Will our auditors accept automated postings?

Auditors tend to prefer them: every action is logged with its trigger, inputs and outcome, approvals are enforced rather than assumed, and nothing depends on someone's memory of what they did in March.

Our ERP is old and heavily customised.

The usual case. We work through official APIs where they exist and robust monitored bridges where they don't — scoped in the audit, before anything is promised.

What if an automation posts something wrong?

Controls before and after: validation and thresholds catch anomalies pre-posting, exceptions route to people, and postings are designed to be reversible with the audit trail to support correction. A wrong entry becomes a queued exception, not a mystery.

How fast is payback, realistically?

The audit answers per automation — invoice matching and reconciliations commonly pay back within months. If payback runs beyond 12 months, we'll tell you not to build.

Case study · Retail · Automation

Order-to-cash automated across 4 systems and 11 stores

Invoices issued and written back to the ledger without a person in the loop — humans handle exceptions only.

Read the case study →
96%
of orders fully automated
3+ FTE
capacity redeployed

What does your month-end actually cost?

The audit prices it in hours and salary — and ranks the automations by payback.